When I first started with Git I was used to “cvs commit” or “svn commit” committing my changes back to the server, but with Git this is a multi-step step process, as shown here: Git commit is not “cvs commit” or “svn commit”įrankly, this is something I really struggled with regarding Git. If you’re working on a simple project (like I am) you can push your changes back to the origin server with this command: In a sense, this message is a reminder that you need to push your changes back to the origin server. (You most likely did a git clone to get your git repo from the origin server.) This message is telling you that you’ve made some changes locally, and you’re now ahead of the origin server. What the git message is saying is that you’re ahead of “origin/master,” which is usually the branch on your remote git origin server. The thing to know here is that your branch isn’t ahead of the the master - your branch is the master. These git “Your branch is ahead of origin/master” and “ nothing to commit” messages can be misleading, especially to new git users (like myself). git status message: Your branch is ahead of ‘origin/master’ by X commits Nothing to commit (working directory clean) # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 5 commits. Then we run the command git merge new-branch to merge the new feature into the master branch.Git status FAQ: When I issue the git status command, I see the following “Your branch is ahead or origin/master. Once the feature is complete, the branch can be merged back into the main code branch.įirst we run git checkout master to change the active branch back to the master branch. This will change the active branch to the new branch: $ git checkout new-branchĪt this point, commits can be made on the new branch to implement the new feature. To start working on the new branch we first need to run the command git checkout new-branch. Once a feature branch is finished and merged into the main branch, the changes in it become the main branch, until you merge a new feature branch into the main branch.Īt this point we have created a new branch, but are still located on the source branch. You're branching out a new set of changes from the main branch. A branch is like a tag, and the commits are shared. Note: Behind the scenes, Git does not actually create a new set of commits to represent the new branch. a set of changes has been committed on the feature branch – it is ready to be merged back into the master branch (or other main code line branch depending on the workflow in use). Other modern but centralized version control systems like Subversion require commits to be made to a central repository, so a nimble workflow with local branching and merging is atypical.Ī commonly used branching workflow in Git is to create a new code branch for each new feature, bug fix, or enhancement.Įach branch compartmentalizes the commits related to a particular feature. In legacy Version Control Systems (like CVS) the difficulty of merging restricted it to advanced users. This fundamentally improves the development workflow for most projects by encouraging smaller, more focused, granular commits, subject to rigorous peer review. Git's distributed nature encourages users to create new branches often and to merge them regularly as a part of the development process - and certain Git workflows exploit this extensively.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |